A) Yes, because the offer stated it would be open for a period of time and it was accepted before the revocation reached the offeree.
B) Yes, because an offeror is master of his offer and can revoke it at any time.
C) No, because an offeror is master of his offer and can revoke it at any time.
D) No, because Tom only called and did not come with the money for the car.
E) No, because the mailbox rule says that a revocation becomes valid when it is mailed.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Even if an offer is clearly a joke, the words are treated as an offer.
B) A joke is always treated as a serious offer, unless the person specifically states: "I'm joking."
C) A joke is never treated as a serious offer.
D) A joke is treated as a serious offer if the outward manifestation of intent would lead a reasonable person to believe it was intended as a serious offer.
E) The court will look to a person's secret or hidden intent to attempt to discern if a joke was an offer or not.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) must be upheld
B) is extended until Dameon can replace the camper
C) is extended for twenty-one days
D) is automatically terminated
E) would be left to a court to decide whether or not to be upheld.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Jasmine is incorrect because there is a binding bilateral contract.
B) Jasmine is incorrect because there is a binding unilateral contract which Kayla accepted by performing.
C) Jasmine is correct because there is no binding bilateral contract.
D) Jasmine is correct because there is no binding unilateral contract.
E) Jasmine is correct because Kayla acted incorrectly by her manner of attempted acceptance.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The acceptance becomes a counteroffer that the original offeror may or may not accept.
B) There is no contract, and the attempted acceptance is of no effect.
C) There is a contract only if the acceptance is received by the time that acceptance through the authorized means would have been received.
D) The contract is not formed until the acceptance is received by the offeror.
E) Authorizing but not requiring a certain type of acceptance has no effect, and the mailbox rule applies.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was subjectively joking and that both the Zehmers testified they were joking.
B) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because one of the parties was joking, and a reasonable person should have known that.
C) The court ruled that the contract would not be enforced because the parties had been drinking and although they were not intoxicated, there was still no mutual assent.
D) The court ruled that the agreement would be enforced because under the applicable standard, the words and acts, judged by a reasonable standard, manifested an intention to be bound.
E) The court ruled that the contract would be enforced because of what the parties verbally said regardless of whether an objective person would have thought joking was involved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Edwin will win because Zack properly made an offer that Edwin accepted.
B) Zack will win because he was merely expressing possible interest.
C) Zack will win because Edwin did not properly accept.
D) Zack will win because under a subjective standard he was joking.
E) Zack will win because under an objective standard, it appears he was joking.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Edwin will win because Brandi made an offer that he properly accepted.
B) Edwin will win because Brandi agreed to pay a reasonable amount for the vehicle.
C) Brandi will win because the agreement was not put into written form and signed by both parties.
D) Brandi will win because she merely expressed interest and did not make an offer.
E) Brandi will win because she was not provided sufficient time in which to consider the offer.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Isaiah is in breach of contract and must pay Haley damages because she accepted before he could tell her about the fire.
B) Isaiah is in breach of contract and must purchase a similar watercraft to transfer to Haley.
C) Isaiah is not in breach of contract because an insufficient material term involving who would move the watercraft was omitted.
D) Isaiah is not in breach of contract because the offer was not sufficiently definite.
E) Isaiah is not in breach of contract because of destruction of the subject matter.
Correct Answer
verified